Projectors · Head to head

Epson Home Cinema 2350 vs BenQ W2720i

A long-throw lamp or a short-room LED — which should you buy?
Try both in a build →BenQ W2720i in the slot, Epson Home Cinema 2350 one swap away.

The short answer

Buy the BenQ W2720i — it states more of what a living-room setup depends on: a 17.9 ms 4K60 input lag, three external HDMI 2.1 inputs (ALLM stated on two) plus an internal 2.0b port for its streaming dongle, HDR10+ beside HDR10 and HLG, 90% of DCI-P3 and 28 dB of stated noise against 36 dB — and it states a lumen figure (2,500 ANSI) where our Epson row has none. Buy the Epson Home Cinema 2350 if the projector has to sit at the back of the room or off-centre: its 1.32–2.15 throw range starts where the BenQ's 1.0–1.3 ends, and it states ±60% vertical lens shift against ±5%, at $699 less as tracked today.

Build a system around the BenQ W2720i →See whether the BenQ W2720i fits your screen →
As tracked by Home Theater Builder: the Epson Home Cinema 2350 tracks at $1,100; the BenQ W2720i at $1,799. How we verify this data →

Two living-room 4K projectors with streaming built in ($1,100 vs $1,799 as tracked today). The first question is not picture: their stated throw ranges do not overlap, so the room decides before the spec sheet does.

Epson
$1,100
As tracked in our catalog
Full specs & where to buy →
BenQ W2720iMFR-VERIFIED
BenQ
$1,799
As tracked in our catalog
Full specs & where to buy →

Specifications · side by side · per-field provenance

● SOURCE-TRACKED
SpecEpson Home Cinema 2350BenQ W2720i
Price$1,100$1,799
BrandEpsonBenQ
TechnologyLCD 3LCDLED DLP
Native resolution4K pixel shift4K UHD
HDR supportHDR10, HLGHDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Light source typelamp UHPLED
Lamp life, normal (hours)450020000
Throw ratio, min1.321
Throw ratio, max2.151.3
Throw typestandardstandard
Optical zoom range1 – 1.621.3x
Lens shift, vertical (%)±60%±5%
Powered zoomNonot stated
Native aspect ratio16:916:9
Vertical keystoneYesYes
Input lag @ 4K/60 (ms)2017.9
HDMI inputs24
HDMI max bandwidth (Gbps)18not stated
Wi-FiYesnot stated
BluetoothYesnot stated
Orientations supportedfront, rear, ceilingnot stated
Width (in)13.116.5
Height (in)4.85.6
Depth (in)10.912
Weight (lbs)914.1
Fan noise, normal (dB)3628
Power consumption (W)316183
Brightness (ANSI lumens)not stated2500
Contrast ratio, dynamicnot stated2,000,000:1
DCI-P3 coverage (%)not stated90
HDMI versionnot stated2.1
HDMI 2.1 portsnot stated3
ALLMnot statedYes
RS-232 portnot statedYes
12 V triggernot statedYes
Shaded rows differ · green dot = lab-measured · amber = manufacturer-verified · blue = retailer/community-reported · grey = estimated · “not stated” means exactly that

Reading the numbers honestly

Brightness cannot be compared on this page, and we say so rather than guess: our BenQ row records 2,500 lumens from a manufacturer sheet that labels them ANSI, while our Epson row records no lumen figure at all — a gap in our data, not a stated zero — so neither projector is ranked on output. Input lag is stated on both rows in different forms: the BenQ states 17.9 ms at 4K60 as a point figure, the Epson states 'under 20 ms' as an upper bound. The resolution fields name different things: the Epson row states 4K pixel shift (its sheet reads 1920 x 1080 x 2), the BenQ row states 4K UHD at 3840 × 2160. The directly comparable figures are the throw ratios — 1.32–2.15 on the Epson against 1.0–1.3 on the BenQ, both manufacturer-stated. For a 100-inch 16:9 image that works out to roughly 9.6–15.6 ft from the Epson and 7.3–9.4 ft from the BenQ (throw ratio × image width).

The verdict

Buy the BenQ W2720i — it states more of what a living-room setup depends on: a 17.9 ms 4K60 input lag, three external HDMI 2.1 inputs (ALLM stated on two) plus an internal 2.0b port for its streaming dongle, HDR10+ beside HDR10 and HLG, 90% of DCI-P3 and 28 dB of stated noise against 36 dB — and it states a lumen figure (2,500 ANSI) where our Epson row has none. Buy the Epson Home Cinema 2350 if the projector has to sit at the back of the room or off-centre: its 1.32–2.15 throw range starts where the BenQ's 1.0–1.3 ends, and it states ±60% vertical lens shift against ±5%, at $699 less as tracked today.

Shelf at the back of the roomEpson Home Cinema 2350 — A 1.32–2.15 throw ratio (about 9.6–15.6 ft for a 100-inch image) against 1.0–1.3 (about 7.3–9.4 ft) — the two stated ranges do not overlap.
Off-centre placementEpson Home Cinema 2350 — ±60% stated vertical lens shift against ±5% on the BenQ.
GamingBenQ W2720i — A stated 17.9 ms at 4K60 and three HDMI 2.1 inputs, ALLM stated on two; the Epson states under 20 ms as an upper bound, while the Epson sheet states no HDMI version (a third-party review lists its two inputs as HDMI 2.0b).
BrightnessEither — 2,500 lumens labelled ANSI on BenQ's own sheet; our Epson row has no lumen figure on file, so the two are not ranked on output.
Quiet runningBenQ W2720i — 28 dB against 36 dB, both manufacturer-stated (BenQ in its typical mode; the Epson sheet names no mode).
Light-source lifeBenQ W2720i — A 20,000-hour LED in normal mode against a 4,500-hour UHE lamp, both manufacturer-stated.

Where to buy

CHEAPEST FIRST · NOT COMMISSION-RANKED
Epson Home Cinema 2350
Tracked at Epson.com · price not quotable from a search page
CHECKED 1 DAY AGO
Find at Epson.com ↗
BenQ W2720i
$1,799
Cheapest tracked offer · benq.com
CHECKED TODAY
Buy at benq.com ↗
We may earn a commission at no cost to you; it never affects rankings or compatibility verdicts — those come from the data.
Or start from your room instead: take the 60-second interview →

What our normalized data adds

NOT ON THE SPEC SHEETS
  • The two stated throw ranges do not overlap: 1.32–2.15 (Epson) against 1.0–1.3 (BenQ), both manufacturer-stated — for a 100-inch 16:9 image that is roughly 9.6–15.6 ft against 7.3–9.4 ft, so the room's depth picks the projector before any picture spec does.
  • Brightness is reported, not ranked: our BenQ row records 2,500 lumens that BenQ's sheet labels ANSI, and our Epson row records no lumen figure at all — our data's silence, never a stated zero.
  • Input lag is stated in two forms: 17.9 ms at 4K60 as a point figure (BenQ) against 'under 20 ms' as an upper bound (Epson).
  • Different light sources with stated lives: a 200 W UHE lamp rated 4,500 hours in normal mode (Epson) against a 4LED engine rated 20,000 hours (BenQ).
  • HDMI, counted the same way on both sides: three external HDMI 2.1 inputs plus an internal 2.0b port for the streaming dongle, ALLM stated on two (BenQ), against two HDMI inputs on the Epson (no version on its sheet), one used by its included Android TV dongle.
  • The resolution fields name different things: 4K pixel shift on the Epson (its sheet reads 1920 x 1080 x 2) against 4K UHD at 3840 × 2160 on the BenQ, at $1,100 vs $1,799 as tracked today.
Not the exact matchup you wanted?
Swap either product, or add a third, in the compare tool. Or read the guide: The best 4K projectors for a bright living room.
Add a third projector to this comparison →Browse Projectors

More Projectors comparisons

Hisense PX3-PRO vs Epson EpiqVision Ultra LS800Epson Home Cinema LS11000 vs Epson Home Cinema 5050UBSony VPL-XW5000ES vs Epson Pro Cinema LS12000Hisense PX3-PRO vs BenQ V5010i