Subwoofers · Head to head

KEF KC92 vs SVS 3000 Micro

Two sealed compact subwoofers, an octave apart on paper — which should you buy?
Try both in a build →KEF KC92 in the slot, SVS 3000 Micro one tap away.

The short answer

Buy the SVS 3000 Micro while the KEF tracks this far above it — $1,701 today. Twelve hertz of stated extension is real, and so is a gap that size; the SVS is the smaller box, states the wider 30–200 Hz low-pass range and variable phase, and gives up an octave of paper depth to get there. Read the depth claims first, because for once they sit on one yardstick: 11 Hz against 23 Hz, both stated at ±3 dB, close to a full octave apart. Then read the price row, because a difference that size is exactly what this page turns on — and note that only one of these two is small enough to disappear into a room.

Build around KEF KC92Build around SVS 3000 Micro
As tracked by Home Theater Builder: the KEF KC92 tracks at $2,500; the SVS 3000 Micro at $799. How we verify this data →

KEF's KC92 and SVS's 3000 Micro are the two sealed compacts this cross-shop keeps landing on — $2,500 vs $799 as tracked today. For once the depth claims can honestly be read side by side, and that is most of this page.

KEF KC92MFR-VERIFIED
KEF
$2,500
As tracked in our catalog
Full specs & where to buy →
SVS 3000 MicroMFR-VERIFIED
SVS
$799
As tracked in our catalog
Full specs & where to buy →

Specifications · side by side · per-field provenance

● SOURCE-TRACKED
SpecKEF KC92SVS 3000 Micro
Price$2,500$799
BrandKEFSVS
Driver Size Inches98
Driver Count22
Driver Configdual opposingnot stated
Passive Or Poweredpowered activepowered active
Amp ClassClass DClass D
RMS Watts1000800
Freq Response Low HZ1123
Freq Response Toleranceplus minus 3dBplus minus 3dB
Max SPL DB110not stated
Sensitivity Measurement Contextunstatednot stated
Enclosure Typesealedsealed
Lp Crossover HZ Min4030
Lp Crossover HZ Max140200
Auto OnYesYes
Built In Room CorrectionYesYes
App ControlYesYes
Wireless OptionYesYes
Speaker Level InputsYesnot stated
LFE InputYesYes
Height Inches13.910.9
Width Inches1311.7
Depth Inches14.210.7
Finish OptionsWhite Gloss, Black Glossnot stated
Peak Wattsnot stated2500
Phase Controlnot statedvariable 0 to 180
Phase Adjustment Range Degreesnot stated0° – 180°
Weight Lbsnot stated22.5
Shaded rows differ · green dot = lab-measured · amber = manufacturer-verified · blue = retailer/community-reported · grey = estimated · “not stated” means exactly that

Reading the numbers honestly

The depth comparison here is the rare one that survives our own rules: 11 Hz on the KEF against 23 Hz on the SVS, with ±3 dB stated on BOTH rows. Same tolerance, same kind of claim, so this is one yardstick and close to a full octave — no context gap to flag and nothing to hedge. Everything else is a trade. Drivers: dual 9-inch in a stated dual-opposing arrangement against a dual 8-inch pair whose arrangement our SVS row does not record. Amplifiers do NOT line up as columns — 1,000W RMS with no peak figure on the KEF against 800W RMS with a stated 2,500W peak on the SVS — so whichever number you read, the other row does not carry its twin. The KEF's 110 dB maximum SPL comes with the companion field beside it recording that figure's measurement context as UNSTATED, and our SVS row states no maximum-SPL figure at all, so the one output number on this page arrives with no test condition. Both are sealed with built-in room correction, app control, a wireless option and an LFE input; the SVS's auto-on entry is an inference in our data where the KEF's is manufacturer-stated. Setup and connection split cleanly: the SVS states a 30–200 Hz low-pass range and variable 0–180° phase, the KEF states 40–140 Hz, speaker-level inputs and two gloss finishes, and neither row states the other's pair. Cabinet: 10.9 × 11.7 × 10.7 inches and 22.5 lb against 13.9 × 13 × 14.2 inches with no weight figure recorded on the KEF row.

The verdict

Buy the SVS 3000 Micro while the KEF tracks this far above it — $1,701 today. Twelve hertz of stated extension is real, and so is a gap that size; the SVS is the smaller box, states the wider 30–200 Hz low-pass range and variable phase, and gives up an octave of paper depth to get there. Read the depth claims first, because for once they sit on one yardstick: 11 Hz against 23 Hz, both stated at ±3 dB, close to a full octave apart. Then read the price row, because a difference that size is exactly what this page turns on — and note that only one of these two is small enough to disappear into a room.

Stated depth on one yardstickKEF KC9211 Hz against 23 Hz, both stated at ±3 dB — the same tolerance on both rows, so this is one of the few depth comparisons on the site that can honestly be ranked.
A subwoofer that hidesSVS 3000 Micro10.9 × 11.7 × 10.7 inches and a stated 22.5 lb, against a 13.9 × 13 × 14.2-inch cabinet whose weight our KEF row does not record.
Stated amplifierEither1,000W RMS with no peak figure recorded on the KEF against 800W RMS with a stated 2,500W peak on the SVS — the columns do not line up, so neither row is the bigger amplifier on paper.
Dialling it in from the subSVS 3000 MicroA 30–200 Hz low-pass range and variable 0–180° phase on the SVS; the KEF states 40–140 Hz and no phase field at all.
A receiver with no subwoofer outputKEF KC92Speaker-level inputs are stated on the KEF row; our SVS row records an LFE input but no speaker-level input.
Room correction and app controlEitherBoth rows state built-in room correction, app control and a wireless option; the SVS's auto-on entry is an inference in our data where the KEF's is manufacturer-stated.

Where to buy

CHEAPEST FIRST · NOT COMMISSION-RANKED
KEF KC92
$2,500
Cheapest tracked offer · us.kef.com
CHECKED TODAY
Buy at us.kef.com
SVS 3000 Micro
Tracked at Target · price not quotable from a search page
CHECKED 5 DAYS AGO
Find at Target
We may earn a commission at no cost to you; it never affects rankings or compatibility verdicts — those come from the data.

Still deciding?

SVS 3000 Micro vs KEF KC62
Or start from your room instead: take the 60-second interview →

What our normalized data adds

NOT ON THE SPEC SHEETS
  • The one genuinely like-for-like depth comparison on this page: 11 Hz against 23 Hz with ±3 dB stated on BOTH rows — same yardstick, close to a full octave, and no measurement-context gap to flag.
  • Driver areas are stated differently in kind: dual 9-inch drivers in a stated dual-opposing arrangement on the KEF, against a dual 8-inch pair whose arrangement our SVS row does not record.
  • The amplifier columns do not line up: 1,000W RMS with NO peak figure on the KEF against 800W RMS with a stated 2,500W peak on the SVS — two different halves of the same spec, so neither row is the bigger amp on paper.
  • The KEF's 110 dB maximum SPL arrives with its companion field beside it, and that field records the measurement context as UNSTATED — so the one output number on this page has no test condition attached, and our SVS row states no maximum-SPL figure at all.
  • Both are sealed designs with built-in room correction, app control, a wireless option and an LFE input; the SVS's auto-on entry is an inference in our data where the KEF's is manufacturer-stated.
  • Setup and connection split cleanly: the SVS states a 30–200 Hz low-pass range and variable 0–180° phase, the KEF states 40–140 Hz, speaker-level inputs and two gloss finishes, and neither row states the other's pair — at $2,500 vs $799 as tracked today.
Not the exact matchup you wanted?
Swap either product, or add a third, in the compare tool. Or read the guide: Apartment subwoofers: the best picks for small rooms and shared walls.
Add a third subwoofer to this comparison →Browse Subwoofers

More Subwoofers comparisons

KEF KC62 vs SVS 3000 MicroSVS SB-1000 Pro vs SVS PB-1000 ProSVS SB-2000 Pro vs SVS SB-1000 ProSVS PB-2000 Pro vs Klipsch RP-1200SW