Severtson Screens BWAT Classic vs Silver Ticket STR-169135-WAB
Two acoustically transparent fixed frames — which sheet answers your question?
Try both in a build →Severtson Screens BWAT Classic in the slot, Silver Ticket STR-169135-WAB one swap away.
The short answer
There's no single winner on this page — the two sheets answer different questions. Buy from the Severtson BWAT Classic series if you need to confirm the viewing cone (a stated 60° half-gain angle) before sizing a screen to your room. Buy the Silver Ticket STR-169135-WAB if you want a confirmed 135" 16:9 diagonal, a wall-mount install method, and a checkable tracked price ($560 today).
Both screens state acoustically_transparent = TRUE and the same 1.1 gain, so the perforated-material job is a match. What each sheet chooses to disclose runs in opposite directions, and which one you need depends on what you're deciding first.
Specifications · side by side · per-field provenance
● SOURCE-TRACKED
Spec
Severtson Screens BWAT Classic
Silver Ticket STR-169135-WAB
Price
price unknown
$560
Brand
Severtson Screens
Silver Ticket
Screen type
fixed frame
fixed frame
Gain
1.1
1.1
Material type
perforated AT
perforated AT
Acoustically transparent
Yes
Yes
Half-gain angle (°)
60
not stated
Washable
Yes
not stated
Installation
not stated
wall mount
Diagonal (in)
not stated
135
Aspect ratio
not stated
16:9
Frame material
not stated
aluminum
Frame color
not stated
black
Shaded rows differ · green dot = lab-measured · amber = manufacturer-verified · blue = retailer/community-reported · grey = estimated · “not stated” means exactly that
Reading the numbers honestly
The disclosure runs backwards between them. Severtson states a 60° half-gain viewing angle but records no diagonal size — a series-level sheet, since this material sells in multiple sizes, so it answers the optics question but not the sizing one. Silver Ticket states the opposite half of the picture: a confirmed 135" 16:9 diagonal, a wall_mount install method, and a tracked price ($560 today), but its half-gain angle is unstated in our data. Both state acoustically_transparent = TRUE as a stated yes (our booleans are three-state, so this is a real fact, not an assumed default), and both state an identical 1.1 gain. Severtson also carries no tracked price in our data.
The verdict
There's no single winner on this page — the two sheets answer different questions. Buy from the Severtson BWAT Classic series if you need to confirm the viewing cone (a stated 60° half-gain angle) before sizing a screen to your room. Buy the Silver Ticket STR-169135-WAB if you want a confirmed 135" 16:9 diagonal, a wall-mount install method, and a checkable tracked price ($560 today).
Confirming the viewing cone before you buySevertson Screens BWAT Classic — Severtson states a 60° half-gain angle; Silver Ticket's half-gain angle is unstated in our data.
Confirming size and price todaySilver Ticket STR-169135-WAB — Silver Ticket states a 135" 16:9 diagonal, wall-mount install, and a tracked price ($560 today); Severtson's sheet is series-level with no diagonal recorded and no tracked price.
Acoustic transparency for in-wall speakersEither — Both state acoustically_transparent = TRUE — a stated yes on both sheets, not a gap.
Both state acoustically_transparent = TRUE — a stated yes on both sheets (our booleans are three-state, so this is a real fact, not a default) — and both state an identical 1.1 gain.
Disclosure inversion: Severtson states a 60° half-gain viewing angle but records no diagonal size (a series-level sheet that sells in multiple sizes); Silver Ticket states a 135" 16:9 diagonal, wall_mount install, and a tracked price ($560 today), but its half-gain angle is unstated in our data.
Only one side is priced: Severtson carries no tracked price in our data ("price unknown") while Silver Ticket does ($560 as tracked today).
Silver Ticket states its wall_mount installation method; Severtson's install method is unstated in our data.
Not the exact matchup you wanted?
Swap either product, or add a third, in the compare tool.
