AV Receivers · Head to head

Marantz CINEMA 60 vs Denon X3900H

A fully stated 7.2 against a thinly stated 9.4 — which should you buy?
Try both in a build →Marantz CINEMA 60 in the slot, Denon X3900H one tap away.

The short answer

At prices this close — $49 apart in the row above — the architecture is the whole argument. Buy the Denon AVR-X3900H if you want the bigger bed: nine amplified and eleven processing channels against seven and eight, four subwoofer pre-outs against two, plus stated Auro-3D and IMAX Enhanced. Buy the Marantz CINEMA 60 if you would rather have the sheet you can check — it states Audyssey MultEQ XT, a 4–16Ω impedance range and HDMI version 2.1, plus a 40 Gbps figure recorded from a retailer listing and a three-2.1-port count that is an inference in our data, an eARC port and 8K/60 passthrough, and our X3900H row records none of those seven. Power is not what separates them: 100W against 105W at 8Ω and 140W against 135W at 6Ω, each with two channels driven at 0.08% THD, which is about 0.2 dB either way.

Build around Marantz CINEMA 60Build around Denon X3900H
As tracked by Home Theater Builder: the Marantz CINEMA 60 tracks at $1,800; the Denon AVR-X3900H at $1,849. How we verify this data →

Marantz's CINEMA 60 and Denon's AVR-X3900H track close enough that architecture, not budget, is the argument — $1,800 vs $1,849 in the price row above. One of them is the bigger receiver; the other is the one whose sheet you can check.

Marantz CINEMA 60MFR-VERIFIED
Marantz
$1,800
As tracked in our catalog
Full specs & where to buy →
Denon AVR-X3900HMFR-VERIFIED
Denon
$1,849
As tracked in our catalog
Full specs & where to buy →

Specifications · side by side · per-field provenance

● SOURCE-TRACKED
SpecMarantz CINEMA 60Denon AVR-X3900H
Price$1,800$1,849
BrandMarantzDenon
Channel Config7.29.4
Main Channels79
Processing Channels811
Sub Pre Outs24
Height Channels2not stated
Zone 2 CapableYesYes
Watts Per Channel 8ohm100105
Watts Per Channel 6ohm140135
THD Percent0.080.08
Power Measurement Channels Driventwo channels driventwo channels driven
Impedance Range4 – 16 Ω/ohmsnot stated
Impedance Min Ohms4not stated
Impedance Max Ohms16not stated
Dolby AtmosYesYes
Dts XYesYes
Auro 3dNoYes
Room Correction SystemAudyssey MultEQ XTnot stated
Measurement Mic IncludedYesYes
HDMI Inputs66
HDMI Outputs22
HDMI Version2.1not stated
HDMI Max Bandwidth Gbps40not stated
HDMI 21 Port Count3not stated
HDMI Earc Port Count1not stated
Max Passthrough Resolution8K 60not stated
HDR SupportHDR, HLG, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, Dynamic HDRHDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG, HDR10+, Dynamic HDR
VRR PassthroughYesYes
ALLM SupportYesYes
Phono InputYesYes
WifiYesnot stated
BluetoothYesnot stated
Airplay2Yesnot stated
HeosYesYes
Alexa Built InYesnot stated
Ip ControlYesnot stated
Streaming ServicesSpotify Connect, TuneIn, Pandora, Amazon Music HD, DeezerSpotify Connect
Trigger Outputs Count1not stated
Form Factorfull sizenot stated
Width Inches17.417.1
Height Inches6.56.6
Depth Inches13.914.9
Weight Lbs2427.6
Power Consumption W650660
Imax Enhancednot statedYes
Shaded rows differ · green dot = lab-measured · amber = manufacturer-verified · blue = retailer/community-reported · grey = estimated · “not stated” means exactly that

Reading the numbers honestly

Power is the easy part and it is a dead heat: 100W against 105W at 8Ω and 140W against 135W at 6Ω, each row storing the same context — two channels driven at 0.08% THD — so about 0.2 dB separates them and the contexts match exactly. Architecture is the real difference: 7.2 with eight processing channels and two subwoofer pre-outs against 9.4 with eleven and four. Then comes the disclosure gap, and it is wide. Our AVR-X3900H row records no room-correction system, no impedance range, no HDMI version, no bandwidth figure, no 2.1-port count, no eARC count and no passthrough resolution — seven blanks, where the CINEMA 60 states Audyssey MultEQ XT, 4–16Ω, HDMI 2.1, 40 Gbps, three 2.1 ports, one eARC port and 8K/60. Every one of those blanks is a silence in our data rather than a stated absence, and the Denon does state that a measurement microphone is included, which makes the missing correction platform look like our gap and not the product's. It runs the other way twice: the Denon states Auro-3D and IMAX Enhanced, and the Marantz row records Auro-3D as a No that carries no source of its own in our data and has no IMAX Enhanced field. Two provenance notes on the Marantz side: its 40 Gbps figure is retailer-sourced and its three-2.1-port count is an inference in our data.

Compatibility · computed, not written

Checked against a bookshelf that dips to a stated 3.5Ω like the KEF LS50 Meta: KEF LS50 Meta

Can the Marantz CINEMA 60 drive the KEF LS50 Meta?

Marantz CINEMA 60 states a 4Ω-minimum rating; the KEF LS50 Meta dips to a stated 3.5Ω minimum, a little below that floor. Most receivers handle a marginal dip at normal volumes — it's worth watching only at very high output on an entry-level unit.

Can the Denon AVR-X3900H drive the KEF LS50 Meta?

Denon AVR-X3900H publishes no rated impedance range, so the pairing with the KEF LS50 Meta (which dips to a stated 3.5Ω minimum) can't be verified from its spec sheet — we treat that as "can't check", not a pass.

Computed from the catalog's normalized fields — the same fields the builder's compatibility engine reads. A missing field reads as "can't check", never as a pass.

The verdict

At prices this close — $49 apart in the row above — the architecture is the whole argument. Buy the Denon AVR-X3900H if you want the bigger bed: nine amplified and eleven processing channels against seven and eight, four subwoofer pre-outs against two, plus stated Auro-3D and IMAX Enhanced. Buy the Marantz CINEMA 60 if you would rather have the sheet you can check — it states Audyssey MultEQ XT, a 4–16Ω impedance range and HDMI version 2.1, plus a 40 Gbps figure recorded from a retailer listing and a three-2.1-port count that is an inference in our data, an eARC port and 8K/60 passthrough, and our X3900H row records none of those seven. Power is not what separates them: 100W against 105W at 8Ω and 140W against 135W at 6Ω, each with two channels driven at 0.08% THD, which is about 0.2 dB either way.

Amplifier powerEither100W against 105W at 8Ω and 140W against 135W at 6Ω, each row storing two channels driven at 0.08% THD — about 0.2 dB, and the contexts match exactly.
Channels and subwoofer outputsDenon AVR-X3900HNine amplified and eleven processing channels with four subwoofer pre-outs, against seven, eight and two — the one architectural difference on the page.
A stated room-correction platformMarantz CINEMA 60The CINEMA 60 states Audyssey MultEQ XT; our X3900H row records no room-correction system at all, though it does state that a measurement microphone is included — a silence in our data to confirm, not an absence in the product.
HDMI you can verifyMarantz CINEMA 60Version 2.1, a 40 Gbps figure, three 2.1 ports, one eARC port and 8K/60 passthrough on the Marantz row; our X3900H row states none of the five — though the 40 Gbps figure is retailer-sourced and the three-port count an inference in our data, so those two are the ones to confirm before buying.
Low-impedance speakersMarantz CINEMA 60A stated 4–16Ω range on the Marantz; our Denon row states no impedance range for a speaker match to check against.
Auro-3D and IMAX EnhancedDenon AVR-X3900HBoth are stated on the Denon row; the Marantz row records Auro-3D as a No that carries no source of its own in our data and carries no IMAX Enhanced field at all.

Where to buy

CHEAPEST FIRST · NOT COMMISSION-RANKED
Marantz CINEMA 60
Tracked at Best Buy · price not quotable from a search page
CHECKED 8 WEEKS AGO
Find at Best Buy
Denon X3900H
$1,849
Cheapest tracked offer · denon.com
CHECKED TODAY
Buy at denon.com
We may earn a commission at no cost to you; it never affects rankings or compatibility verdicts — those come from the data.

Still deciding?

Marantz CINEMA 60 vs Denon X2800HMarantz CINEMA 60 vs Marantz Cinema 50Marantz CINEMA 60 vs Marantz CINEMA 70sDenon X3900H vs Marantz Cinema 50Marantz CINEMA 60 vs Denon X2900H
Or start from your room instead: take the 60-second interview →

What our normalized data adds

NOT ON THE SPEC SHEETS
  • Power is like-for-like on both figures each row states — 100W against 105W at 8Ω and 140W against 135W at 6Ω, each with two channels driven at 0.08% THD — so roughly 0.2 dB separates them and the badges carry more difference than the amplifiers do.
  • The architectures do not match: 7.2 with eight processing channels and two subwoofer pre-outs against 9.4 with eleven processing channels and four.
  • Our AVR-X3900H row records NO room-correction system, no impedance range, no HDMI version, no bandwidth figure, no 2.1-port count, no eARC count and no passthrough resolution — seven blanks that are silences in our data, never stated absences.
  • It runs the other way twice: the Denon states Auro-3D and IMAX Enhanced as manufacturer figures, while the Marantz row records Auro-3D as a No that carries no source of its own in our data and carries no IMAX Enhanced field.
  • Provenance honesty on the fuller sheet: the Marantz's 40 Gbps HDMI figure is retailer-sourced and its three-2.1-port count is an inference in our data — the two numbers here we would confirm before buying for a 4K/120 console.
  • A whole network block sits on one row only: the CINEMA 60 states Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, AirPlay 2, Alexa, IP control, a trigger output and five streaming services, against one streaming service and HEOS on our X3900H row, which carries no other network field, with the two tracking within $49 of each other above.
Not the exact matchup you wanted?
Swap either product, or add a third, in the compare tool. Or read the guide: 5.1 vs 7.2 vs Atmos: how many channels?.
Add a third receiver to this comparison →Browse AV Receivers

More AV Receivers comparisons

Marantz CINEMA 60 vs Denon AVR-X2800HMarantz CINEMA 60 vs Marantz Cinema 50Marantz CINEMA 70s vs Marantz CINEMA 60Denon AVR-X3900H vs Marantz Cinema 50